The president of Brazil, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, has once again ignited controversy with a forceful statement about the future of betting houses in the country: if it were up to him, he would close them. He stated this in an interview with the portal ICL Noticias, where he described the current situation as “unbridled gambling” that, in his view, the State must curb.
Read more United Kingdom: punters reject mandatory affordability checks
The statement that reignites the debate on online gambling in Brazil
Lula’s words left no room for interpretation:
“I want to say the following: if it were up to me, we would close the betting houses. Obviously, it depends on the National Congress, on the discussion. I know who finances them, but everyone knows who the deputies, the parties, and the senators are. So it is not possible to continue with this unbridled gambling in this country.”
The president acknowledged that the final decision rests with the Legislative Power, but made his personal stance and frustration clear regarding the political influence that, according to him, surrounds the sector.
Lula dismisses the idea that football depends on betting to survive
One of the most recurring arguments from the gambling industry is that its activity is indispensable for financing sports, particularly football. Lula categorically rejected this. For the president, Brazilian football has subsisted for more than a century without the need for these economic injections and can continue to do so.
The head of state also mentioned that he has been debating internally for weeks about the scope of the regulation:
“I have been talking about this betting business for fifteen days. If they cause the damage we believe they cause, why not end betting? Or regulate them so there aren’t so many in Brazil, if they even have any utility at all.”
A pattern of criticism repeated since the beginning of 2026
The president’s statements are not an isolated event. Since January 2026, Lula has intensified his attacks against the sports betting and online casino ecosystem, which he points to as one of the factors behind the growing debt of Brazilian households.
In March, the president had already publicly stated that his desire was to eliminate online casinos, in a speech that reinforced the official narrative: online gambling is a social problem, not a source of regulated entertainment.
Read more US: CFTC escalates conflict with states over control of prediction markets
Indebtedness, the true background of the conflict
Behind Lula’s crusade against gambling is an economic reality that pressures his administration. According to data from Serasa, 81,7 million Brazilians are in debt in 2026. This figure has deteriorated the perception of the president’s third term and threatens to complicate his candidacy for re-election scheduled for the end of the year.
To respond to this crisis, the Federal Government is designing a debt renegotiation program that, according to official versions, could include a clause prohibiting those who join the plan from betting. The measure would seek to prevent funds intended for paying debts from ending up on gambling platforms.
The regulatory paradox: Lula signed the law that enabled betting
Lula’s speech clashes, however, with his own legislative record. It was during his current term that Law No. 14.790/2023, known as the Betting Law, was enacted, establishing the legal framework for the operation of sports betting houses and online gambling platforms in Brazil.
The regulation, which at the time was presented as a tool to organize a market that was already operating informally, is today the target of criticism from the same president who gave it legal life. This contradiction has fueled the debate over whether the Government can, or really wants to, backtrack on an industry to which it granted a framework of legitimacy less than three years ago.
Congress, the true arbiter of regulation
Lula was explicit in recognizing that any substantial change in gambling regulation in Brazil requires the endorsement of the National Congress. And there, as he hinted without naming anyone, the sector has allies who block more severe reforms.
The tension between the Executive and the Legislative branches regarding betting is emerging as one of the axes of the Brazilian political debate during 2026, a year in which the presidential elections will concentrate public attention and in which the domestic economy will continue to be the main thermometer of citizen support for the president.
Read more France pressures the gambling industry: ANJ demands concrete results against gambling addiction
