The regulatory landscape for online gambling in Netherlands faces potentially transformative changes following the presentation of the new minority government’s coalition agreement. The 67-page document, published on January 30, outlines plans to completely ban gambling advertising and potentially restrict the number of licenses available in the Dutch market.
Read also: Filipinas establishes B2B regulatory framework for online gaming
The tripartite coalition, comprising the centrist D66 party, the conservative Christian Democrats, and the right-wing VVD party, emerged after the October general elections where no single party secured a majority. These early elections followed the collapse of the previous government led by Dick Schoof, whose term ended abruptly due to disagreements over asylum policy.
The new government agreement adopts particularly strong language, comparing online gambling to sex work, noting that both activities, while legal on Dutch territory, are vulnerable to crime and human trafficking. This comparison has generated controversy within the gambling sector, which considers the parallel stigmatizing and inappropriate.
Netherlands: Regulator Warns of Tense Relationship with Policymakers
Michel Groothuizen, chairman of Kansspelautoriteit (KSA), the Dutch gambling regulator, has publicly expressed the inherent difficulties in the relationship between the technical authority and politicians, regardless of the party in power.
Speaking to specialized publication iGB during the ICE event in January, Groothuizen noted that “the industry is not very well received by most political parties. The analysis we produce and the measures we propose are perhaps considered too pragmatic.”
The KSA chairman has consistently rejected several policy proposals he deems counterproductive, including raising the legal gambling age and a complete ban on gambling advertising. Groothuizen argues that these measures, while politically attractive, lack technical grounding and could lead to unintended consequences.
Regarding the new minority coalition, Groothuizen anticipated that the government would face significant challenges in securing parliamentary support and passing measures, considering it is the first minority coalition in the Netherlands in over 100 years. Nevertheless, he positively assessed politicians’ willingness to maintain open discussions with the regulator.
Legal Framework Seeks to Simplify Renewal Process in Netherlands
Justin Franssen, a Dutch lawyer specializing in gambling law, noted at the time that “the gambling authority strives to make the new application process as simple as possible.” This pragmatic approach seeks to balance regulatory rigor with the operational sustainability of the legal market.
Read also: PAGCOR faces a year of transition marked by the decline of in-person gambling
Björn Fuchs of VNLOK complemented this view, stating that “if you don’t have a history, there are some hurdles, but for several modules, you can simply submit a declaration stating that you meet the requirements.” This simplified procedure would primarily apply to operators with consistent compliance histories.
However, uncertainty about how the new coalition might modify renewal criteria or impose additional restrictions on the number of available licenses keeps the industry in a state of caution. The proposal mentioned in the coalition agreement about “potentially restricting available online licenses” lacks specific details on methodology, timeline, or technical justification.
Economic and Fiscal Prospects of the Regulated Market
In the Netherlands, the legal online gambling market represents a significant source of tax revenue for the Netherlands. With gross revenues of approximately €1.3 billion ($1.41 billion) annually in its current state, and considering the 30.5% tax rate on GGR, the sector generates approximately €400 million ($434 million) annually for the public treasury.
The migration of activity to the black market implies proportional tax losses, estimated at over €200 million ($217 million) annually if the trends from the first half of 2025 are maintained. These losses occur in a context of budgetary constraints affecting multiple European countries.
Implementation Timeline Remains Undefined in Netherlands
In the Netherlands, the coalition agreement does not specify concrete timelines for the implementation of the total advertising ban or potential license restrictions. These details will depend on the specific legislative formulation and the subsequent parliamentary process.
Considering it is a minority coalition, any legislation will require negotiations with opposition parties to secure parliamentary majorities. This political context could moderate initial proposals or significantly extend implementation deadlines.
Read also: Brazil faces sustained growth in the illegal betting market
