The Government of the Region of Murcia confirmed that, for the moment, it will not require compliance with the 500-meter restriction between gambling halls and educational centers in those establishments that are in the process of license renewal. The decision is based on the need to preserve the legal certainty of operators who obtained their authorization under previous regulations, thus avoiding retroactive changes that could affect consolidated rights.
Read also: Chile: Charity files money laundering complaint against online payment processors
This stance by the regional executive is generating controversy at a time when various Spanish autonomous communities have reinforced restrictions on in-person gambling, especially in proximity to educational centers and other places frequented by minors.
The decision implies that gambling halls that obtained their licenses before the implementation of the new restrictions will be able to continue operating in their current locations, even if they are less than 500 meters from schools or institutes, as long as they comply with the renewal requirements established in the regulations under which they were originally authorized.
Context of the regulatory debate in the Region of Murcia
The controversy in the Murcia Region intensified at the end of 2025, when the Contentious-Administrative Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice of the Region of Murcia annulled the urban planning reform approved in 2023 by the plenary session of the Lorca City Council. This judicial decision represents a significant shift in the debate on the regulation of in-person gambling in the autonomous community.
The annulled regulatory modification established a minimum distance of 500 meters between gambling halls and educational centers, in addition to imposing a separation of 1,000 meters between the gambling establishments themselves. The stated objective of these measures was to limit the concentration of venues in certain areas and to strengthen the protection of sensitive environments where minors transit or gather.
The judicial annulment of this urban planning reform left the application of the new distance restrictions in suspense, creating a regulatory vacuum that the regional government must address while defining its legislative strategy in this matter.
Stance of the Regional Executive on Legal Certainty
During the last control plenary session in the Regional Assembly, the Murcian executive defended its position of not applying, for the moment, the new restriction to establishments awaiting license renewal. According to the government’s argument, applying the new requirements to already granted authorizations could generate legal uncertainty and affect acquired rights of operators who invested in confidence in the regulations in force at the time of obtaining their licenses.
Read also: Tribunal of Brazil orders mandatory warnings about addiction risks on betting platforms
The principle of legal certainty is a fundamental pillar of Spanish administrative law that protects the legitimate trust of citizens and companies in the stability of norms. The regional government maintains that retroactively modifying the conditions of licenses already granted could violate this principle and expose the administration to legal claims from affected operators.
Comparison with other Spanish Autonomous Communities
The situation in Murcia contrasts with the policies implemented in other Spanish autonomous communities, where stricter restrictions on in-person gambling have been established. Communities such as Madrid, Catalonia, Andalusia, and the Valencian Community have approved regulations in recent years establishing minimum distances between gambling halls and educational, health, or social centers.
In some of these regions, restrictions have also been applied to license renewals, forcing some establishments to close or relocate if they do not meet the new distance requirements. This more restrictive approach has generated legal conflicts with operators who claim a violation of acquired rights.
Implications for the Gambling Sector in Spain
The case of Murcia illustrates the challenges faced by Spanish administrations in regulating in-person gambling in a context of growing social sensitivity towards its potential negative impacts. Regulatory fragmentation among autonomous communities creates inequalities in the operating conditions of the sector and complexities for companies operating in multiple territories.
This situation contrasts with the regulation of online gambling in Spain, which depends on a single national authority, the Directorate-General for Gambling Regulation, although the autonomous communities retain competencies over advertising and gambling addiction prevention aspects.
The evolution of the debate in Murcia and other autonomous communities will likely influence future discussions on a possible national harmonization of minimum criteria for the establishment of in-person gambling venues, although the current distribution of competencies grants broad scope for action to regional and local administrations.
Read also: South Dakota moves toward online sports betting with state Senate approval
