The state of Illinois joins a small group of jurisdictions seeking to define their own legal framework for prediction markets. Senate Bill 4168, introduced on March 5, proposes the creation of the Prediction Market Regulation and Taxation Act, an initiative that establishes entry conditions, tax obligations, and consumer protection mechanisms for operators of these types of platforms.
Read more Women’s Day in Peru: what elections say about political opportunities for women
The proposal comes at a time when the regulatory debate over prediction markets is intensifying at the federal and state levels, driven in part by legislation such as the ORACLE Act, which seeks to clarify which agencies have jurisdiction over this sector.
What is understood by prediction market in the proposed legislation
In Illinois, SB 4168 defines a prediction market as a platform where participants trade contracts whose value depends on the outcome of verifiable future events. These contracts can be binary or multi-outcome, provided their settlement is linked to the occurrence of a previously defined event.
Among the markets enabled by the bill are those linked to political elections, economic indicators, regulatory decisions, climate outcomes, and entertainment awards, among other real-world developments susceptible to objective verification.
The exclusion of sporting events: a deliberate boundary
One of the most relevant aspects of SB 4168 is what it expressly leaves out of its scope. Contracts linked to athletic competitions or any component of sporting events are excluded from the new regulatory framework. Sports betting and casino games will continue to be governed exclusively by current Illinois laws.
This delimitation responds to a logic of protecting existing regulated markets. The text of the bill explicitly states that prediction markets must not overlap with sports betting or any other casino-style gambling modality.
The licensing scheme: one million dollars to operate in Illinois
Any operator wishing to offer prediction market contracts to Illinois residents must obtain a master license issued by the state Gaming Board before launching their services. The initial fee for that license is set at $1 million, with a validity of 12 months.
Annual renewal has the same cost: $1 million. Additionally, operators must continuously demonstrate compliance with the law and the rules established by the Board, making the license a process of permanent supervision rather than a one-time authorization.
Read more UK: BGC launches “Spot The Black Market”, an interactive game to identify illegal gambling sites
A 50% tax on adjusted gross income
The tax burden imposed by SB 4168 is significant. The bill establishes a 50% privilege tax on adjusted gross income generated by prediction market contracts involving Illinois residents.
The tax base is calculated by deducting payments made to participants and certain deductions permitted by the rule from the total received. Taxes must be remitted monthly to the Gaming Board and will be deposited into the state’s general revenue fund, or another fund designated by legislative appropriation.
Consumer protection and responsible gaming
The proposed regulatory framework includes a set of obligations aimed at protecting users. Among the most relevant are the restriction of access to those over 21 years of age, the use of geofencing technology to block access from jurisdictions where the service is prohibited, compliance with anti-money laundering regulations, the implementation of responsible gaming tools, and continuous monitoring of market integrity.
All these provisions will be supervised by the Illinois Gaming Board, which will act as the central authority for the new regime.
ORACLE Act and the dispute over regulatory jurisdiction
Illinois is not acting in a vacuum. SB 4168 is part of a broader debate over who has the authority to regulate prediction markets in the United States. Operators have argued in various instances that their activity under federal legislation exempts them from compliance with state rules, but that argument has been repeatedly rejected in the courts.
The ORACLE Act, a federal initiative, seeks to resolve that dispute by establishing which agencies, such as the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, have regulatory jurisdiction over event-based prediction markets. Illinois, with its own legislation, is attempting to anticipate that debate and build a solid local framework before the federal landscape is definitively defined.
Read more Sportradar Marketing Services will drive the growth of SkillOnNet’s online casino brands
