Mississippi approved on Wednesday the Mississippi Mobile Sports Betting Act, identified as HB 4074, with a vote of 100 in favor and 11 against. The bill, introduced by Representative Casey Eure just one day before its vote, was also quickly approved by the Ways and Means Committee, reflecting the strong political momentum that this time accompanies an initiative that had already failed in previous legislatures.
Read more Brazil presents the first annual report of the regulated betting market
The central novelty of this version is a tax reduction component for casinos: the rate they pay would drop from 8% to 6%, which amounts to approximately $48 million in annual tax cuts for the sector. This incentive points directly to the heart of the problem that has blocked the expansion of online gaming in Mississippi for years: the resistance of brick-and-mortar casinos to a modality they fear could cannibalize their business.
A long history of failed attempts
Mississippi was one of the first states in the United States to legalize sports betting in 2018, albeit with a restrictive condition: the activity could only be carried out in person within casinos. Since then, attempts to expand that authorization to the mobile and online environment have systematically clashed with opposition from the Senate.
HB 4074 marks the third consecutive year that the House of Representatives has passed an online sports betting bill. A previous measure by Eure introduced in this same legislative session, HB 1581, had already been passed by the House but failed to advance in the Senate. Last year, after the Senate rejected another similar bill, the House modified a Senate initiative that directly prohibited online betting in casinos, which led to its elimination in a conference committee. The Senate again passed a bill this month prohibiting betting in casinos, illustrating the depth of the disagreement between the two chambers.
Tax reduction as a strategy to win over the sector
The political key to HB 4074 lies in its attempt to transform casinos from opponents into allies. Smaller regional casinos have historically been the actors with the most influence over Senate lawmakers, and their main fear is that the arrival of large online sports betting operators in the state will displace players from physical properties to digital platforms controlled by outside companies.
The reduction from 8% to 6% in the tax rate for casinos seeks to offset that potential risk and align the sector’s interests with the expansion of the digital market. Eure described the cut as a measure to help establishments remain competitive in a transforming environment.
Read more Gambling in the UK shows greater intensity among a small group of users
Eure’s previous bill from this same session included a $6 million fund to help smaller regional casinos absorb the impact of online competition. HB 4074 replaces that mechanism with the general tax reduction, a broader and more structural approach.
The arguments dividing the Senate
The Senate’s resistance to the legalization of mobile sports betting has a clear spokesperson: Senator David Blount, chairman of the Senate Gaming Committee. Blount has repeatedly argued that online betting does not align with the original goals that led Mississippi to legalize gambling in its territory.
For Blount, the historical justification for gambling in the state was always to attract investment, generate jobs, and promote tourism. Mobile sports betting, in his view, meets none of those criteria, as the user bets from their phone without stepping into a casino or consuming in the local environment. The senator has also stated that he would not consider any legislation in this regard unless the Mississippi Gaming Commission itself requested the expansion, and that additional revenue alone is not a sufficient argument to justify the change.
The bet on the regulated market versus illegality
Eure, on the other hand, argues from a different perspective. For the representative, the legalization of mobile sports betting would allow for the capture of a significant portion of the market that currently operates illegally, without controls or guarantees for the consumer, and without providing resources to the State.
In statements prior to the session, Eure emphasized that a regulated framework would offer real protection to users, including specific mechanisms to prevent access by minors, while generating a new source of income for brick-and-mortar casinos and helping to address the state retirement system’s deficit.
Read more Argentina strengthens responsible gambling training
